Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Denis Goacher results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Unattributed Quote, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,147 of 28,364 speakers). This Denis Goacher is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Denis Goacher
Speaker details
Total words: 63
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos63 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos