Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Delvone Michael results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,503 of 28,364 speakers). This Delvone Michael is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Delvone Michael
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.0%45.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.7%21.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos