Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Fulton results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 410 hits . Analysis detected 2,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,009 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,274 of 6,628 authors). This Nick Fulton is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Nick Fulton
Author details
Total words: 3,009
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.6% 13.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.9% 10.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst