Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DelBene results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Genetic Fallacy, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 64.3% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 153 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (7,759 of 27,299 speakers). This DelBene is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
DelBene
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
52.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 64.3%64.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 64.3%64.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 64.3%64.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 64.3%64.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 35.7%35.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 64.3%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 64.3%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 64.3%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 64.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos