Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Del Boy results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,146 of 28,364 speakers). This Del Boy is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Del Boy
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos