Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deere & Company results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 50.6% saturation with 88.875 hits. Analysis detected 311.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,498 of 28,364 speakers). This Deere & Company is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Deere & Company
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
28.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.6%50.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 37.6%37.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 37.6%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos