Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deb Haaland results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 195 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,230 of 28,364 speakers). This Deb Haaland is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Deb Haaland
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.5% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos