Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These De Los Santos results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 57.7% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 216 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,036 of 28,364 speakers). This De Los Santos is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
De Los Santos
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.7% percentile
51.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 57.7%57.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 57.7%57.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 57.7%57.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 57.7%57.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 57.7%57.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 42.3%42.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos