Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dayna Zipursky results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 77.3% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 292 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,139 of 28,364 speakers). This Dayna Zipursky is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Dayna Zipursky
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 77.3%77.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 77.3%77.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.7%22.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 77.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 77.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos