Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Peery results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 56.3% saturation with 20.25 hits. Analysis detected 68.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (15,724 of 38,314 speakers). This David Peery is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
David Peery
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠59%David Peery (selected)39%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.0% percentile
38.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 56.3%56.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 56.3%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos