Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video37.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Norris results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Burden of Proof, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,160 of 26,979 speakers). This David Norris is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
David Norris
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 37.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.9% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos