Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Møller Wolfe results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 102.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 94.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,819 of 28,364 speakers). This David Møller Wolfe is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
David Møller Wolfe
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠83%David Møller Wolfe (selected)95%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510083.0% percentile
94.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 84.7%84.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 84.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos