Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video197.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Lopez results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 286 faulty-reasoning hits from 197.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,484 of 28,364 speakers). This David Lopez is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
David Lopez
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 197.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
11.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos197.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.2%19.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Anecdotal: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos