Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video145.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Kipping results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 254.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 145.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,717 of 28,364 speakers). This David Kipping is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
David Kipping
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠24%David Kipping (selected)16%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 145.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.4% percentile
15.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos145.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos