Speaker summary
ā 85%1 analyzed article/video94.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Johns results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Begging the Question, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75.1% saturation with 71.111 hits. Analysis detected 428.736 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.5% and a BS Rank of ā 50% (14,279 of 28,201 speakers). This David Johns is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
David Johns
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 50%David Johns (selected)32%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 94.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.4% percentile
31.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos94.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.1%75.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 45.4%45.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 29.6%29.6%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 26.8%26.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 27.8%27.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 40.1%40.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.9%40.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.1%14.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.1%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 45.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 0.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Red Herring: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos