Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Greene results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 99 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (1,049 of 27,798 speakers). This David Greene is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
David Greene
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠97%David Greene (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

96% percentile
025507510096.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

KUER Weekend Programming Changes 2026⁠51%
KUER⁠0%By KUER 90.1⁠0%6/26/2026, 8:47:55 PM