Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Flippo results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Circular Reasoning, Confirmation Bias, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 78.5% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 2,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 261 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 55.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,646 of 28,364 speakers). This David Flippo is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
David Flippo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 261
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.0% percentile
55.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos261 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 78.5%78.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 78.5%78.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 78.5%78.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 78.5%78.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 78.5%78.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 78.5%78.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 60.1%60.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 60.1%60.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 60.1%60.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 60.1%60.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 78.5%, sitewide 5.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 78.5%, sitewide 0.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 78.5%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 78.5%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 78.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 78.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.1%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 60.1%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 60.1%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 60.1%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 60.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 60.1%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Speaker 60.1%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos