Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video57.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Drucker results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Straw Man, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.4% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 121.237 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,308 of 28,364 speakers). This David Drucker is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
David Drucker
Speaker details
Total words: 57.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
26.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 44.4%44.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.8%23.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.0%21.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 5.3%Straw Man: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos