Speaker summary
73% 15 analyzed articles/videos 472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Burden of Proof , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 125 hits . Analysis detected 857 faulty-reasoning hits from 472 analyzed words across 15 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,413 of 28,364 speakers). This David is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. David
Speaker details
Total words: 472
Content count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 9.6% BS Score15 analyzed videos472 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 25.2% 25.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 26.5% 26.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 18.6% 18.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 15.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst