Speaker summary
69% 2 analyzed articles/videos 300.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dave Specter results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Overconfidence Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 92 hits . Analysis detected 714.506 faulty-reasoning hits from 300.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,822 of 28,364 speakers). This Dave Specter is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. Dave Specter
Speaker details
Total words: 300.5
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.0% percentile 8.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos300.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 21.6% 21.6% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 9.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst