Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dave Patterson results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 56.6% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 77.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,162 of 28,364 speakers). This Dave Patterson is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Dave Patterson
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
51.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 56.6%56.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 45.4%45.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 56.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 45.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos