Speaker summary
⁠52%4 analyzed articles/videos567.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dave Limp results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Begging the Question, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 964.602 faulty-reasoning hits from 567.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,120 of 28,364 speakers). This Dave Limp is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Dave Limp
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 567.667
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.4% percentile
6.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos567.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 0.3%0.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Special Pleading: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos