Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Carter results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Begging the Question , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 191 hits . Analysis detected 1,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,451 of 6,628 authors). This Tom Carter is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Tom Carter
Author details
Total words: 2,232
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst