Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video82.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dave Carew results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Unattributed Quote, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 183.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (17,928 of 27,710 speakers). This Dave Carew is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Dave Carew
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 82.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
21.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos82.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos