Speaker summary
⁠97%2 analyzed articles/videos72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darby O'Connor results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Horn Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 216 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,366 of 28,364 speakers). This Darby O'Connor is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Darby O'Connor
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.1% percentile
75.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 56.9%56.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 43.1%43.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 56.9%, sitewide 6.9%Horn Effect: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 1.0%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos