Speaker summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video137.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Smith results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 137.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,986 of 28,364 speakers). This Danielle Smith is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Danielle Smith
Speaker details
Total words: 137.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
22.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos137.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 26.4%26.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 7.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos