Speaker summary
⁠33%2 analyzed articles/videos106.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Allen results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 248 faulty-reasoning hits from 106.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,929 of 28,364 speakers). This Danielle Allen is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Danielle Allen
Speaker details
Total words: 106.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
32.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos106.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.0%27.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos