Speaker summary
47%1 analyzed article/video1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Tatlow-Devally results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 857.684 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,323 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,311 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Tatlow-Devally is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Daniel Tatlow-Devally
Speaker details
Total words: 1,323
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos