Speaker summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Tatlow-Devally results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Self-Serving Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 72 hits . Analysis detected 857.684 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,323 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,311 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Tatlow-Devally is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Daniel Tatlow-Devally
Speaker details
Total words: 1,323
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst