Speaker summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Stern results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 34 faulty-reasoning hits from 149 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (24,215 of 26,409 speakers). This Daniel Stern is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Daniel Stern
Speaker details
Total words: 149
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751008.3% percentile
8.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos149 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos