Speaker summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos186.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Siad results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 56.1% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 275 faulty-reasoning hits from 186.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,675 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Siad is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Daniel Siad
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 186.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.1% percentile
17.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos186.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 56.1%56.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 56.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos