Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Shriro results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 761 faulty-reasoning hits from 300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,725 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Shriro is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group.
Daniel Shriro
Speaker details
Total words: 300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.8% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos300 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.2%26.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Red Herring: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.6%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos