Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Miller results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 152 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,655 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Daniel Miller
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠70%Daniel Miller (selected)50%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos