Speaker summary
⁠29%2 analyzed articles/videos63.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Eskridge results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 63.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,476 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Eskridge is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Daniel Eskridge
Speaker details
Total words: 63.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
19.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos63.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.6%17.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos