Missouri man charged with conspiracy to commit murder at White House UFC event 15%

By Rob Edwards0%

6/17/2026, 12:10:42 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 48.2% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 857 faulty-reasoning hits from 326 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31% and a BS Rank of 15% (18,731 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the article peer group.

A Missouri man is among five people charged on Tuesday in connection with what the FBI said was a plot to attack and kill government officials during an Ultimate Fighting Championship event at the White House on Sunday. 
Daniel Eskridge of Caldwell County is charged with conspiracy to commit murder on White House grounds. 
Eskridge is from Kidder, about 60 miles north of Kansas City. 
According to court documents, the group held multiple conversations on encrypted social media platforms in which members discussed assassinating several politicians and business executives during the UFC event. 
Authorities said the group planned to detonate small drones carrying explosives over the arena and open fire as people ran away. 
Charging documents state that Eskridge sent a photo to the online group on May 22 that showed tactical equipment, including a rifle, helmet and ballistic vest. 
Investigators said when the group began discussing potential targets, Eskridge said they would be "big and someone the majority of the country knows." 
The FBI said agents executed a federal search warrant at Eskridge's home on June 13, where they reported finding rifles, a shotgun, pistol and "other tactical gear." 
According to a federal affidavit, the investigation began June 10 when the parents of 19-year-old Tycen Proper of Ohio contacted local police because they were concerned about his recent statements and behavior. 
Proper's mother said her son was communicating online with a group, the affidavit says, that "expressed ultra-religious and anti-government sentiments, specifically citing grievances about government corruption, the handling of the Epstein files, data centers taking up all the water in communities and other government actions." 
The FBI said Proper admitted involvement in the alleged plot and identified the other members of the online group. 
According to charging documents, one of the other men charged in the case described Eskridge as the person "running the show." 
Copyright 2026 St. 
Louis Public Radio 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.1%Rob Edwards: 2.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias22.1%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Rob Edwards: 2.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic8.6%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 27.0%Rob Edwards: 7.1%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect27.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 3.7%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Rob Edwards: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias6.4%This article: 29.1%Rob Edwards: 4.3%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias29.1%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Rob Edwards: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error3.4%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Rob Edwards: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias13.8%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Rob Edwards: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 48.2%Rob Edwards: 5.6%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority48.2%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.0%Rob Edwards: 2.8%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion12.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 2.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.1%Rob Edwards: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal7.1%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.4%Rob Edwards: 1.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.4%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 39.0%Rob Edwards: 3.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote39.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 26.4%Rob Edwards: 2.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice26.4%This article: 6.4%Rob Edwards: 3.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination6.4%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

326 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers5.8%attributed speech307writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageDaniel Eskridge • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageLouis Public Radio • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Daniel Eskridge

100%flagged-word coverage
16 attributed words84% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote-41.4 ptsWriter: 41.4%Daniel Eskridge: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-28.0 ptsWriter: 28.0%Daniel Eskridge: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.8 ptsWriter: 6.8%Daniel Eskridge: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.