Speaker summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Bandwagon, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 27.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,630 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Daniel
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 63
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
27.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos63 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 26.7%26.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 26.7%26.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.8%19.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.8%19.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos