Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana LaRue results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.6% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 176.301 faulty-reasoning hits from 78 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (13,017 of 28,364 speakers). This Dana LaRue is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Dana LaRue
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 78
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
35.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos78 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 54.6%54.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 45.6%45.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.5%17.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 54.6%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 45.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos