Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Hawkinson results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 57.1% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 323.63 faulty-reasoning hits from 152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,160 of 28,364 speakers). This Dana Hawkinson is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Dana Hawkinson
Speaker details
Total words: 152
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
20.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos152 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 57.1%57.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.5%16.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 57.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos