Johnson County leads cyclosporiasis cases as parasitic illness explodes across Kansas 60%

By Frank Morris31%

7/23/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 447 faulty-reasoning hits from 315 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 56.2% and a BS Rank of 60% (8,756 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the article peer group.

Cyclosporiasis cases in Kansas have jumped more than fivefold in a week. 
And Johnson County is leading the increase. 
Last week the Kansas Department of Health and Environment counted 55 cases of cyclosporiasis, an intestinal illness caused by the cyclospora parasite. 
The latest numbers from Wednesday show 289 known cases in Kansas, 95 in Johnson County alone. 
Wyandotte County recorded 11 cases. 
Dr. 
Dana Hawkinson at the University of Kansas Health System says that’s likely an undercount. 
“I think there is that concern that cases are being missed just because sometimes you can be asymptomatic, sometimes you can have an episode or two or maybe one day of feeling bad,” Hawkinson said. 
Cyclosporiasis is not a new disease, but typically only about 500 cases a year crop up nationwide. 
Health officials have documented well over 4,000 cases so far this year. 
Michigan has been especially hard hit. 
The good news is that the cyclospora parasite doesn’t normally transmit directly from person to person. 
“Most of the time it is food,” Hawkinson said. 
“That is why it is so vitally important to understand where is the source of this contamination and how do we stop it.” 
Fresh produce can carry the cyclospora parasite. 
Investigators suspect that iceberg lettuce shipped to Taco Bells from Taylor Farms may be at least part of the problem. 
Missouri’s Department of Health and Human Services has logged 216 cyclosporiasis cases in that state through last weekend. 
Cyclosporiasis is very treatable, and nothing experimental or particularly expensive is required to knock it out. 
Bactrim, a common antibiotic, does the job. 
“It’s a very common, old drug that's been used a lot and is used for many different things,” Hawkinson said. 
“It's very safe and proven.” 
There is one small catch. 
To get a conclusive cyclosporiasis diagnosis, doctors need a poop sample. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.3%Frank Morris: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 17.5%Frank Morris: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic17.5%This article: 5.4%Frank Morris: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic5.4%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Frank Morris: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias6.0%This article: 2.2%Frank Morris: 3.5%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Frank Morris: 5.1%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Frank Morris: 2.9%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 2.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 16.2%Frank Morris: 1.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias16.2%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.7%Frank Morris: 3.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority13.7%This article: 1.6%Frank Morris: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma1.6%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.7%Frank Morris: 3.9%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization12.7%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.5%Frank Morris: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon3.5%This article: 7.3%Frank Morris: 2.7%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion7.3%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.3%Frank Morris: 2.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.9%Frank Morris: 2.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.9%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.1%Frank Morris: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote11.1%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.5%Frank Morris: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice3.5%This article: 7.3%Frank Morris: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination7.3%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Frank Morris: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.3%

315 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker34%attributed speech209writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDana Hawkinson • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDana Hawkinson • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDana Hawkinson • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDana Hawkinson • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDana Hawkinson • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDana Hawkinson • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dana Hawkinson

100%flagged-word coverage
106 attributed words100% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Unattributed Quote+33.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Dana Hawkinson: 33.0%33.0%Indoctrination+21.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Dana Hawkinson: 21.7%21.7%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.6 ptsWriter: 9.6%Dana Hawkinson: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%Dana Hawkinson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.