Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video94.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Stricker results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 54.9% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 279 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,717 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Stricker is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Dan Stricker
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 94.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.1% percentile
25.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos94.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 43.0%43.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 31.0%31.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos