Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video71.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan North results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Recency Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 35.5% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 152 faulty-reasoning hits from 71.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,466 of 28,201 speakers). This Dan North is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Dan North
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠39%Dan North (selected)24%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 71.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
23.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos71.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 35.5%35.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos