Speaker summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Neidle results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 46.878 hits. Analysis detected 345.027 faulty-reasoning hits from 145 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,764 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Neidle is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Dan Neidle
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 145
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.3% percentile
19.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos145 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.6%16.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos