Author summary
76% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,626 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucy Mangan results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 1,857 hits . Analysis detected 9,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,504 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,154 of 6,628 authors). This Lucy Mangan is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Lucy Mangan
Author details
Total words: 6,504
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.6% 28.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst