Speaker summary
⁠77%3 analyzed articles/videos794.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Hoffman results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Composition/Division as the most egregious example at 70% saturation with 580 hits. Analysis detected 4,231.826 faulty-reasoning hits from 794.333 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (19,376 of 25,747 speakers). This Dan Hoffman is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Dan Hoffman
Speaker details
Total words: 794.333
Content count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.7% percentile
16.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos794.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 70.0%70.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 40.7%40.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 38.6%38.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 31.4%31.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Composition/Division: Speaker 70.0%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 40.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 31.4%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.4%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.1%Composition/DivisionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos