Speaker summary
⁠54%3 analyzed articles/videos141.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Diorio results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Slippery Slope, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 49.5% saturation with 93.578 hits. Analysis detected 514.578 faulty-reasoning hits from 141.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (15,254 of 26,155 speakers). This Dan Diorio is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Dan Diorio
Speaker details
Total words: 141.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
26.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos141.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 49.5%49.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.4%16.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 49.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos