Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Ayoub results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 43.3% saturation with 121.771 hits. Analysis detected 380.605 faulty-reasoning hits from 281 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,873 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Ayoub is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Dan Ayoub
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 281
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
20.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos281 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 43.3%43.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos