Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video120.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daming Yang results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 184 faulty-reasoning hits from 120.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,980 of 28,364 speakers). This Daming Yang is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Daming Yang
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 120.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.5% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos120.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.5%33.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos