Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dallas Federal Reserve Bank results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,647 of 28,364 speakers). This Dallas Federal Reserve Bank is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Dallas Federal Reserve Bank
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos