Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pamela K. Starr results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 839 hits . Analysis detected 5,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,837 of 6,628 authors). This Pamela K. Starr is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Pamela K. Starr
Author details
Total words: 4,992
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.2% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.8% 16.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 9.4%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst