Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video45.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daiwa Institute of Research results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 74.4% saturation with 36.064 hits. Analysis detected 142.806 faulty-reasoning hits from 45.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,926 of 28,364 speakers). This Daiwa Institute of Research is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Daiwa Institute of Research
Speaker details
Total words: 45.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
44.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos45.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 59.3%59.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 74.4%74.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.8%32.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 74.4%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 59.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos