Speaker summary
⁠48%2 analyzed articles/videos78.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cultural Landscape Foundation results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 45.1% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 78.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 36.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,847 of 28,364 speakers). This Cultural Landscape Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Cultural Landscape Foundation
Speaker details
Total words: 78.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
36.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos78.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 45.0%45.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.0%45.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.5%27.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos